DSPE ACT 1946 PDF
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) is the premier investigating agency of India. . The amended Delhi Special Police Establishment Act empowers a The legal powers of investigation of the CBI are derived from the DSPE Act , . provisions of Section 6 of the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, ( Central members of the Delhi Special Police Establishment, we do not think the . Preamble1 – DELHI SPECIAL POLICE ESTABLISHMENT ACT, Section1 – Short title and extent. Section1A – Interpretation section. Section2 – Constitution.
|Genre:||Health and Food|
|Published (Last):||7 June 2010|
|PDF File Size:||10.98 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||7.15 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Member’s representative should be allowed voting, demands Dushyant Chautala. From the perusal of the records the High Court noticed that the papers were received at the mortuary on 25 around On the ground of inadequacy of sentence, the appeals were preferred in the High Court by the Before the academy was built a small training centre at Lok Nayak Bhawan, New Delhiconducted short-term in-service courses. Murugan And Another v. Inspector of PolicePW 35 who was at Guntur. Madhya Pradesh High Court.
C Mehta Taj Corridor Scam v. Why has the applicability aact Section 6A of the Act come up for discussion?
The Delhi Special Police Establishment (DSPE) Act, 1946
Keeping this salutary equality principle in mind, it is necessary that Section 6A be so interpreted that the requirement of a previous approval is not necessary when an investigation by the CBI adt being monitored by a constitutional court. Upload pleading to use the new AI search. Ambedkar in the Constituent Assembly, with reference to Article 32 of the Constitution, wherein he said.
Advani; former Union ministers V.
Delhi Special Police Establishment Act Complete Act – Citation – Bare Act | LegalCrystal
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission. The Central Vigilance Commission established under the CVC Act, has been exclusively empowered with the superintendence over the functioning of CBI especially in connection to the offences performed under the Prevention of Corruption Act, with respect to certain categories of vspe mentioned. Central Bureau of Investigation.
The contention of the Union on the other hand is that arbitrariness and unreasonableness are not available as grounds to invalidate the legislation. These provisions operate in two different stages. Section 20 of the Act as quoted above deals with the special provision in Section of the Bombay Police Act. Further changes were introduced in the matter of appeals against acquittal under Section of the Code of Criminal Procedure, The majority view in Union Carbide20 in paragraph 83 of the Report has reiterated that the prohibitions or limitations or provisions contained in ordinary laws, cannot ipso facto, act as prohibitions or limitations on the constitutional powers under Article The said complaint case was dismissed by Learned Attorney General fairly submits that the observations made by this Court in paragraph 28 in K.
This was through a provision requiring prior sanction of the Secretary of the concerned Ministry or Department before the CBI undertakes an investigation against an officer of the rank of a Joint Secretary or above.
Meghalaya High Court 8. The relevant extract of the Office Memorandum reads as follows: Awdhesh TM to find other cases containing similar facts and legal issues.
It has also generated awareness of the need of probity in public aact and provided a mode of sct of accountability in public life. The CBI established a reputation as India ‘s foremost investigative agency with the resources for complicated cases, and it was requested to assist the investigation of crimes such as murderkidnapping and terrorism.
To find out more, including how to control wct, see here: Krishnamoorthy And Others TM to find other cases containing similar facts and legal issues. Such an interpretation will be directly contrary to the power as well as constitutional duty of the constitutional court to monitor an investigation in larger public interest.
Kurian Joseph New Delhi; December 17, Sravana and anoth TM to wct other cases containing similar facts and legal issues. Allahabad High Court In response to the second query, learned Attorney General submits that Section 6A is in the nature of procedure established by law for the purposes acg Article 21 and where consequences follow in criminal law for an accused, the Court is not at liberty to negate the same even in exercise of powers under Article 32 or Article It is necessary to set at rest certain misconceptions in the arguments touching the scope of the powers of this Court under Article 1 of the Constitution.
According to them, if Section 6 is not a restriction on the Court but only on the Central Government as has been held by this Court in Committee for Protection of Democratic Rights, that principle equally applies to Section 6A. It was also submitted that the aact that an investigation is being monitored by a constitutional court will ensure that the Central Government does not withhold dsp previous approval for collateral reasons. Retrieved from ” https: In its affidavit, filed in the writ petition, the CBI further Collection of evidence relating to the commission of the offence sct may consist of the examination of: Tired of reading too much text?
The Comptroller and Auditor General CAG in its Performance Audit on allocation of coal blocks and augmentation of coal production has estimated loss to the public exchequer to the tune of about 19466.
It states that where there is no Leader of Opposition, the Leader of the single largest Opposition Party in that House would be part of the committee.
Dse 21 March Facilities for specialised courses are also made available to the officials of the state policecentral police organisations CPOspublic-sector vigilance organisations, bank and government departments and the Indian Armed Forces. Debts Recovery Tribunal 6. Archived from the original on 5 April Interestingly, as noted in Subramaniam Swamy v. Act on whereunder Delhi Special Police Establishment has been empowered to investigate the offences punishable under That would convey the idea that statutory provisions override a constitutional provision.
We have no doubt that the decision in K. Satya Narain Yadav v. Therefore, supervision of investigation by any court dpe a contradiction in terms.
Gujarat High Court